Back on 1 August 2013, I wrote a blog on my history in the hobby and the changes and inspirational sources.   The blog promised a continuation of the discussion.  Here is a little more focused blog that tries to address where I am at in this hobby.   You may not find this to be of any interest so you can tune in when the next blog is released.  I am afraid that my blog falls way short of expressing a philosophical point.  I read Trevor Marshall’s Port Rowan blog and Mike Cougill’s OST blog with interest.  I find that I lack their skill or interest to wax at great length on an issue so the following rambling is my attempt at introspective thought.

I look back at my many years in the hobby and I realize that I rarely stick to one thing very long in terms of prototype following.   There are so many cars, locos and scenes that can capture my interest for a while and then the next new thing happens.   To some extent I find myself following what other people like.   I wonder why I do that.  Maybe it is my interest in being accepted within a community.  Maybe it is just sharing a other peoples interests and being able to relate to them better.   Many years ago, I used to accused of being the rubber gauge guy who switched around from HO to S to HO to O to On3 to S to P48.   I think that I have cured myself of that tendency.   When you are younger, it is easy to start anew in a different gauge or prototype.

When you are 69 years old, the hobby becomes a finite timespan.  I have to focus to accomplish my goal of building a P48 scale railroad.   I can best describe my modeling over the past year of staying sort of neutral in prototype selection with three different railroads in-play.   Now that is a short course to not accomplishing a thing.   I have tried to apply logic to the process and create a spread sheet to rank important features of one road versus another.  Oh yes, I need to add a fourth road to the mix and that is a freelance railroad much like was done in the 1950s when prototype information and models were scarce.

I have found that a logical decision process doesn’t work in the creative side of the brain.  It runs on emotion.   Inspiration to build models is an emotional experience to me.   All the engineering training of 40 + years in the high technology world hasn’t suppressed the emotional side of the brain.

The side effects of multiple prototype interest are many.  Dividing one’s time and attention between three prototype roads reduces output on the bench.   It is costly when you add up the cost of brass locomotives, books, decals, photos, drawings, parts, kits and historical society memberships.   Now that I am retired I have to reconcile the cost versus benefits.   As soon as I invent that algorithm, the problem will be solved.

I suppose the benefits of following multiple railroads is the opportunity to meet many fine modelers and historians that might not have crossed my path otherwise.  Through these friendships I have learned a great deal and had access to many interesting photos, drawings and modeling items like decals.  They are the essential building blocks of any pursuit in prototype modeling.  Along with this access to these modelers, I have egged them on to do things of interest to me and maybe few others.   It seems that my role in the hobby has been of impresario.   I have suggested new projects for decals, brass imports and detail parts.  Some good has come of my suggestions although one importer has had a few close calls with my suggestions.   One has a sense of accomplishment when the project results in a tangible item.  I have found that my tendency towards esoteric items lessens the chances of success for my accomplice.  There is another effect is the self-limiting aspect of being held back waiting for a specific project like a switch stand or a specific brake wheel.   Time passes by as attempts are made to raise your pet project higher on the list of priorities.

My role as the impresario of my current modeling interest is coming to close.   I need to fend for myself and do my own thing.  I hope that I will get more accomplished now that I am not waiting around for a friend to do something for me.

I look at what Jim Zwernemann has done with his layout and model building and compare to my meager output. That comparison alone is forcing me to relook at my practices.  He has been far more productive.   Jim stopped doing patterns and kit designs for manufacturers and focused on projects that fit into his railroad.  A noble idea if you have a well defined concept like Jim.   That is the problem for me.  A well defined concept would make more sense and allow me to get something done.  Now how do I do that?

I will let you know how this all turns out.   I promise not to bloviate in the column any time soon.

Now, we will return to our regularly scheduled programming.   The next blog will return to the topic of Jim Zwernemann’s layout.



11 thoughts on “CONTINENTAL DRIFT- Part II

  1. A very enjoyable read, Gene. Thanks for posting. I’m still at the rubber-gauger stage – I enjoy too many aspects of the hobby, in too many scales and gauges for my own good. I’m hoping that my current layout is my last one in the current layout room because tearing them out and starting over when I get bored is time-consuming, emotionally draining, and costly.
    I’ve made more progress on this layout than any previous attempt (in any space) so I think that’s a good sign. We’ll see…
    – Trevor (Port Rowan in 1:64)

    • Trevor
      You are still young and can afford the time to go another way.
      In some respects, Port Rowan has caused me to think about a practical railroad. You have struck a chord.
      Thank you,

  2. A lovely selection of words Gene, I always enjoy your blog. On a separate continent, I too am adrift with thoughts on where I want to go with railroad prototypes. But perhaps as my Swedish friend put it, “Whatever makes your boat float!”

  3. You raise many interesting points in this blog. I have not suffered with your delemas as my interest is very narrowly focused on the D&RGW in the Alamosa area during the 1947-1953 era. I came to this critera when I figured out I would never have enought money to build the Tennessee Pass along with the 6 L-131’s needed to duplicate a day’s worth of traffic. Wanting to do narrow gauge pushed the switch to P:48. Now I concentrate on learning to models of my interest area and enjoy the efforts of others who model their favorite roads and try to learn from them. Keep going, it’s all enjoyabe reading.

  4. Gene – Always great to read your blog posts! I have enjoyed building freight cars first of all, then have enjoyed the thought of building passenger cars, cabooses and a loco or two. I have also enjoyed measuring freight cars and making drawings of them. Over the last 40 years, I also have measured depots and other railroad structures here in Texas. Years ago, I decided on a time frame of March 15th to April 15th of 1948 – that has saved a lot of money buying diesel models!

    • Its me again… I feel it is important to pick a prototype road, then a location as well as a time period. As for helping manufacturers/importers with projects, it is my opinion that the most important thing is to research the desire among O scale modelers for the particular car or loco. I feel an obligation to the mfg/importer to give him something that at least has a chance of selling out!!! A.T. Kott

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s